top of page

Palermo corrected an error that nevertheless failed to go unnoticed

Writer: Turf Diario
Turf Diario
5 hours ago
2 min read

In the third race, the number 4 board was posted at the top of the order of finish despite having been clearly beaten by number 2. Its owners even took the winner's circle photo, but the official placing was eventually clarified prior to mutuel payouts



The gray-haired man claims—and there is no reason to doubt him—to have spent 60 years at the races and never witnessed a similar situation. What happened? It took place during the third race on Friday at Palermo, where an error on the results board (and perhaps by the judges?) was corrected just in time to avoid what would have been an embarrassing spectacle for the ages.

Following a tight finish, television replays had shown with reasonable clarity the victory of Pinko (Forge) over the favorite and debutant Sebito (Gouverneur Morris) to claim the Premio Garabito, a mile event for 3-year-old maiden colts.

The green flag was raised, yet general astonishment followed when the number 4—belonging to Sebito—was posted at the top of the board. To make matters worse, Sebito returned unsaddled and limping, having sustained an injury during the run.

In disbelief, his connections proceeded to take the mandatory winner’s circle photo, almost as a matter of formality. The photo-finish image then appeared on the monitors, confirming what had been evident to the naked eye: Pinko had indeed hit the wire first.

A few moments of suspense followed until someone at the track realized the mistake. By the time the mutuel windows opened for payout, Pinko’s backers breathed a collective sigh of relief as the error was rectified.

"It was a shame because we missed out on taking the winner's photo, but at least the situation was resolved," commented members from the winner's camp.

The truth is that these are not minor details, and a racetrack of Palermo's caliber cannot afford such lapses. Thoroughbred racing relies entirely on betting, and wagering must remain transparent, precise, and free of flaws or errors.

Comments


bottom of page